Thursday, September 14, 2017



Update : S.9(1) Peaceful Assembly Act 2012


Despite no affidavit in reply filed and consent by DPP, the Session Court Judge dismissed the application to refer the case to High Court to decide whether to refer to Federal Court under S.30 of Court of Judicature Act on point of constitutionality of S.9(1) PAA 2012.

Hearing date of this case had been fixed to Wednesday, 20th Sept 2017.

Meanwhile, we will file an appeal against the Session Judge's decision and apply for a stay pending the appeal.




video



video

Tuesday, September 5, 2017





An unwarranted attack on Tamil Malar owner and staffs in KL on 5th September 2017
---------------------------


Alleged gangsters today visited a Tamil news daily office and beat up their staff over a expose made about an MIC leader.

Tamil Malar, had exposed MIC Wilayah state chairman Datuk M. Saravanan for stealing from the rental collection of the state MIC building.

This infuriated the MIC leader who is also Deputy Youth and Sports Minister was at the scene.

Minutes after arriving Saravanan, the gangsters and some MIC CWC members went to Tamil Malar and assaulted the General Manager Saraswathy with punches and slaps.

The gangsters then directed their violence towards the owner of the paper, Oms Thiagarajan.

The chaos left a bloody situation where both the GM, owner and some staff were left bleeding, injured and even suffered some broken teeth.

The incident is a major blow to the credibility of Barisan Nasional, where a woman reporter cum General Manager of a daily newspaper was attacked mercilessly by the politician and his goons.

Drastic and immediate action should be taken for such a heinous attack on a media practitioner and their staff.

I urge National Union of Journalists Malaysia (NUJ) to also bring this up and call for immediate action as this is blatant physical attack due to a media expose.

This also serves as a U-turn to any ground made in the country for press freedom and the protection of media practitioners.

Barisan Nasional should also take action against this leader as he is bringing shame to the party and coalition.

I Met lawyer Saras at the Dang Wagi Police HQ. Mr. Peri the General Manager was then giving a statement to the police.

Mr Oms the owner and well philanthropist was injured and has been rushed to Hospital.


Media Statement by M Kula Segaran MP for Ipoh Barat and DAP National Vice Chairman in Ipoh on 5th September 2017


A PM LICENSED TO DECLARE AS HE PLEASES
If Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak can declare a public holiday shortly after the courts have declared that he is not a public official, what is the country in for?

It did not take long for the rakyat to find out where and what this anomaly can lead to.

When holding forth at the Transformasi Nasional ( TN50) dialogue session over the long weekend, the PM implored women in the audience to vote BN strongly so that recovery of its two-third majority in Parliament will ensure constitutional changes enabling passage of amendments, known as 88A, to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976.

Last November, while shaping to make the promised changes to the Act, the government introduced 88A, which states, "Where a party to a marriage has converted to Islam, the religion of any child of the marriage shall remain as the religion of the parties to the marriage prior to the conversion, except where both parties to the marriage agree to a conversion of the child to Islam, subject always to the wishes of the child where he or she has attained the age of eighteen years."

The above proposal was unveiled in 2009 as a cabinet directive after the controversy flared in the public arena following an estranged husband's conversion of three children, who were minors, to Islam.

This was the infamous Indira Gandhi case where the three minor children of this kindergarten teacher were unilaterally converted to Islam by her estranged husband without her say so.

Four cabinet committees were tasked over the last eight years to see how the cabinet directive of 2009 to prevent this travesty of natural justice from repetition be framed as law.

This task was accompanied by much hemming and hawing until the public were told before the last parliamentary session that the 88A proposal was to materialize in the overall amendments to the 1976 Act.

The omens were not hopeful because of reported opposition by some MPs that 88A constituted a violation of the constitution.

In the event, 88A was withdrawn at the last minute when the 1976 Act came up for second reading in Parliament last month.

The Government held that 88A was unconstitutional as apparently it contravenes Article 12(4) of the Federal Constitution that states "the religion of a person under the age of eighteen years shall be decided by his parent or guardian.”

This stance of government does not hold water for the following reasons:-

1) If it was good law in 2009 why suddenly it became unconstitutional in 2017?

2) The government is buckling to pressure from Islamists and PAS whom Umno wants as an ally in the coming elections

3) Umno wants to leverage the issue to gain support from Malay/Muslim voters

4) From 1957 the interpretation of the word “parent” was ibu dan papa in Bahasa but after 2002 it became “ibu atau bapa”. Clearly the little Napoleons are inserting their own administrative interpretation to the words in the Federal Constitution.

Let us not overlook the authoritative text of the Federal Constitution which in law is the English text.

5) And, in any case, if the 88A were adopted by Parliament, it would be overrid any administrative orders as were decisions of civil courts, including the ones from the Federal Court, as earlier demonstrated in the sorry saga of the case of the children of Indira Gandhi.

By withdrawing 88A, the BN government ignored the rights of minorities and allowed these to be superceded by the majority.

Finally, we in the DAP, as the responsible opposition in Parliament, could have been approached by the government to support what would have been a superfluous constitutional amendment, in the event such an amendment were deemed to be necessary.

To overcome their lack of two-third majority in Parliament, the BN could have had the support of us in the DAP, ever eager supporters of 88A.

Why the DAP, which has 36 parliamentary seats, were not consulted to garner this support?

We were more than eager to see 88A to go through the legislative process and would have been steadfast in supporting it unconditionally.

PM Najib should not pull wool over people's eyes.

We know anomalies abound under Umno-BN governance but when accompanied by absurdities such as them wanting a two-third majority to legislate what they promised to enact but then absconded from lack of political will, the people must draw the line against duplicity that takes them to be stupid.


M.Kula